Note: All names are fictitious.
Data Collection and Analysis The data set consisted of email exchanges with teachers from participant schools in Brazil throughout the school year (collected and organized thematically); teachers’ written participation in chats (online exchanges) was also documented; semi-structured, one-hour-long telephone interviews with the three focal teachers were conducted. During the research, analytical memos were written to register routine activities and events. Open coding was conducted to describe the nature of teachers’ agency as they joined RiverWalk Brasil. The coding addressed questions such as what are the participants doing? What are their concerns? How does what they are doing vary with conditions? What do they see as their constraints and their possibilities? (Emerson, Fretz, & Shaw, 1995). Analysis is sorting out the structures of signification (Geertz, 1973). This step led to selecting, integrating and organizing codes in order to develop more focused analytic language or categories. Multiple categories were interrelated in order to develop assertions about what had happened by looking for key linkages among various items of data and typical events (Erickson, 1986). Multiple readings of the data set materials were performed. The goal was not to look for themes; rather the interest was in identifying potential commonalities across the three focal teachers and also across other collected materials. This constituted the beginning of inductive analysis. Later some of these notes were developed in short paragraphs. Attempts were made to associate excerpts of the data to what appeared to a theme. Parts of the raw data were clustered around these paragraphs. An interpretive narrative was developed. It was based on the data and it evolved by these key ideas. This narrative was later expanded to the Findings section of this paper. The diversity of kinds and sources of data and the presence of multiple perspectives on the data was strictly observed. The goal was to incorporate multiple kinds and sources of data and multiple participants’ perspectives to build a unified narrative.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION This section was developed around two main topics in the data: the reasons why teachers engaged in the enactment of the RiverWalk Brasil project; and the actions originated from teachers’ participation.
Reasons for Participation The Deconstruction of Stereotypes Currently in Brazil it is commonly said that public school teachers are second-class professionals that ended up on that job “for the lack of a better one.” Maria (see Table 1) explained that teachers like her have been blamed for the impression held by many “that students from public schools have no perspective in life, that they don’t like to learn, that they don’t like to think, that they are not interested in their communities.” She thought that this mistaken representation of public schools is a serious issue. Claudia reassured the quality of her teaching practices by explaining that “I tell them let’s think about it, let’s develop the [chemical] formula on our own. I am not going to put out all the information on the blackboard so that you can copy the pre-made summary. We are going to construct our own summary. In the beginning they struggled, but now they are well adapted to it.” Roberta said that “even though I hate my [low] salary, I like challenges [such as the RiverWalk Brasil project].” These teachers’ narratives constitute a renewed perspective about the negative common sense about public schools in Brazil. Maria, Roberta, Claudia and the other participant teachers volunteered to take the lead in their schools and to work as informal coordinators of RiverWalk Brasil. There was no direct financial compensation for them and the time dedicated to it did not count as part of their official workload. According to them, the participation in the project was an opportunity to develop new teaching practices. This allowed them to fight back against the frustration of being defined as “second-level” professionals. In this case, the structure of the public school did not limit many teachers’ actions developed in connection to the RiverWalk Brasil project, which will be detailed next.
Building a Sense of Distinction One important element of the theoretical construct about agency presented in this paper refers to one’s ability to move both within, and outside of, a certain field (e.g., public education) to broaden one’s possibilities to achieve needed resources to reach certain goals. During the interviews and electronic conversations teachers formulated two main aspects of RiverWalkBrasil that seemed to connect with these formulations. Claudia and other teachers were attracted to the perspective of affiliation, even if only informally, with the foreign university where the project was held. Claudia and other teachers were interested in crossing the field of K-12 public education to enter the field of higher education—in this case through their participation at the project conducted at a U.S. university. Claudia said that when she first talked about the project to her students, she said “we will investigate rivers … there is a plan like this and that from a university in the United States that is the RiverWalk.” In an email from late June, Claudia said that she “received this morning a big package [project materials] direct from the U.S. … I don’t even have to say that some people [other teachers] were extremely jealous J.” Roberta and other teachers saw yet another interesting possibility of field crossing by participation in the project. She was interested in becoming skilled in computer technology applications. Before she was invited to join the project she “had already mentioned [to the school administration] a desire to work in the computer lab. But I had to learn it since I didn’t know how to do it.” Participation in the project became an opportunity for her to acquire specific knowledge about technology use. She said that she “only received [external technical] training because of RiverWalk.” Teachers understood that participation in the project opened up opportunity to access these fields (higher education, computers, media) and then to access resources usually scarce for public school teachers. These resources configure forms of cultural capital (e.g., a U.S. university, computer skills) (Bourdieu, 1986). Bourdieu elaborated that:
Organized Improvisation and Access to Resources Teachers understood that in order to fulfill their role as participants in the project they would have to stretch their teaching repertoire and they would have to seek still other resources to “empower” themselves. They engaged in “organized improvisations” given the tensions between specific kinds of demands embedded in the activities proposed by the web-based learning project and the lack of structure and experience faced in these schools. Teachers accessed “material” and “non-material” resources that allowed them to move ahead toward their goals within the learning project. In an email from the beginning of June, Roberta complained about the lack of traditional sources of information and expressed her concerns. “We [Roberta, other teachers on her team and students] have found great difficulty in gathering information about the river … Even though students visited eight different institutions to collect information we haven’t moved very far ahead.” That seemed to be a difficult challenge for them given the lack of official sources of information. She wrote that “we thought about giving up … After intense discussion we decided to look for other sources of information … It took us a while to realize that the people living near the river could be of great help”, Roberta said. A similar experience occurred in other schools and soon teachers shared their struggle to find resources and also their ways to face it by exchanging emails among them. Almost all schools have presented pictures of people who live near the rivers and their testimonials. This experience characterized an initiative to access local “funds of knowledge”(Moll, Amanti, Neff, & Gonzalez, 1992). Teachers also had to deal with the lack of money and basic infrastructure to organize field trips. They insisted on doing the field trips so that students could take a “real” look at the “problems involving the river and the community where they live” according to Maria. To make it happen some teachers produced and sold T-shirts to raise money while others used their personal connections in the state and city departments of education to request a bus to transport the class to the riverbed. Carol reported that they “wanted everybody to be able to participate in the online chats but we had only one computer. We did not even have a projector. One of us read aloud everything that appeared at the computer screen and we would tell the one in charge of the keyboard [students rotated this position] what to say in response”. These events portray how teachers have improvised and acted to access human and non-human resources in need to achieve project’s goals in their teaching. They engaged in “organized improvisation” to access material and non-material resources not available in the field of public education in Brazil.
Teachers Transpose Schemas The move to go outside the school to access scarcely available computer technology resources once again ended up becoming a very meaningful opportunity for some teachers to transpose schemas. It was a new experience for them, given that most of their teaching experience had been restricted to the school boundaries. Later on in the project Claudia (whose school did not yet have an established Internet connection at that point) told her students that they should find a way to participate in the upcoming online chat with other participant schools. Claudia said she paid close attention to the ongoing online interaction from moment to moment while she exchanged messages with her students. Instead of standing in front of the class to give her lecture, Claudia sat down in front of a computer on a remote location. Online teaching was new for Claudia. She addressed students’ questions by reflecting that “the worst problems about the destruction of the river are related to human action.” During this chat Claudia also exchanged ideas with students from other schools. This event constituted a new experience for Claudia in two ways. She used her experience as a teacher gained by teaching inside a traditional classroom to manage her teaching as she participated in the web-environment. At that point, Claudia transposed her schemas (cognitive patterns, embodied practices, principles of action) about how to be a good teacher in this new way of teaching — sitting alone in front of a computer screen at a nearby library to participate at short lessons with students she had never met. Claudia selectively recognized schemas (it was a teaching space, but not a traditional one), located them (it was possible to use some traditional teaching techniques even in this unconventional setting) and implemented them (she asked questions and clarified concepts) in an ongoing transaction (during the web-interaction when concepts have been discussed between teacher and students). Claudia’s transposition of schemas took place in tension with the public school structure given the current understanding that only teachers who have received extensive professional training would “succeed” to teach a lesson in a web-environment, which was not her case. This episode is also representative of what Bourdieu (1992) has referred to as tensions leading to transformations in the course of actions and Wacquant (1992) has identified as “political undone.” Instead of adopting a passive attitude and accepting the many limitations, teachers transformed problems into opportunities to learn and therefore to become better teachers.
Embedded Agency Teachers’ “structurally embedded agency” described along this section developed into an array of new actions. Teachers were not limited by the structure of public schooling. Instead, they explored the tensions in the structure (within and across fields) and they accessed needed resources (both material and non-material). On certain occasions, teachers faced the lack of resources by developing “organized improvisation.” Teachers did that by transferring schemas (based on previous knowledge) to solve new difficulties. In overcoming an initial lack of resources needed and desired to enact the learning project, teachers challenged the idea of public schools as a site where failure is the norm. This indicates that teachers’ agency within the learning project “reconfigured” (Sewell, 1992) the structure of certain public schools in Brazil. At the end of the school year the participant teachers and students published their web page at the project’s web interface. The project became news in many local newspapers and at TV stations. Two schools received a small grant from the state government that would support students to work more closely with the project in the following school year. One teacher applied for a master’s degree since she was interested in reflecting further about her experience in the project. Two teachers from different cities in the same state organized a meeting among participating teachers and shared conversations held during the meeting with other teachers by email. Claudia’s school received a Science Awards hosted by the UNESCO (in partnership with the Ministry of Education). Teachers also talked about the direct impact of the project on students. “It restored students’ self esteem,” said Maria. “After RiverWalkBrasil students have asked for more projects like this. They want to use the computer lab and they know it is possible to do something because I did something even though I didn’t know anything about computers,” added Roberta.
CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that the scarcity of computer technologies at public schools and the lack of teachers’ experiences with web-based learning projects did not constitute a barrier to implementation. Teachers’ agency manifested by fields crossing and the transposition of schemas to achieve needed resources. This allowed the achievement of the RiverWalk Brasil project goals and practices. This demonstrates that the initiative of reform projects and the availability of computer technologies at school – even if precarious and limited – creates possibilities for new teaching and learning experiences. The mismatch between the original characteristics of the learning project developed in the U.S. and the situation of public schooling in Brazil originated a gap that had to be bridged by the participant teachers. This resulted from demands posed by the project focused on the “developed nations” schools and certain conditions of “Third World” public schools. In many cases, such gap has been bridged by new interventions and programs (grants, professional training, and new equipment) to allow the achievement of proposed goals or it has led to failure (teachers end participation, students loose interest, the project disintegrates). Such was not the case of the experiences analyzed in this paper. The RiverWalkBrasil experience reveals the presence of new elements and the participation of teachers aiming to explore the fissures in the structure of a complex field to achieve certain aims. This perspective problematizes the assumption informing previous studies and policy that subordinates the extensive availability of computer technologies and teacher professional development in the area as sine qua non elements for the success of similar “modernizing” initiatives of school reform. This paper has shown why and how teachers operated inside and outside of the field of public education, they improvised and they accessed resources necessary to bridge that gap. Teachers’ actions seem to be in line with Bourdieu’s formulation that:
Some teachers could not conclude all of the activities proposed by the project since a few schools lost their Internet connection service during the project. One teacher left the project apparently given the extremely precarious situation of the computer machines in her school. These experiences indicate barriers posed by the field of public education that, however, did not obstruct most teachers and students from enacting the project. As identified in studies conducted in Egypt (Megahed & Ginsburg, 2004) and Argentina (Birgin, 2000), teachers often develop contrasting solutions for problems targeted by reforms in education, because and despite of local barriers and challenges. This research project also faced limitations. Teachers’ actions to bridge the gap produced by the lack of resources constituted a very positive initiative, but it may have been an extraordinary occurrence within the enduring and challenging public school routine in Brazil. Future case studies conducted with teachers who have been using computers for many years may be able to demonstrate if and how the novelty aspect of the project may have played a key role among teachers’ dispositions to overcome the multiple challenges. Future studies may reveal what happens once the novelty effect fades away. This seems to be in line with Grace’s proposition that “schools … are both arenas of change and repositories of continuity” (1978, p. 51). The fact that teachers developed ways to overcome so many adversities does not mean that the Brazilian federal government (and also the state and local governments) should feel less obligated to fulfill its responsibilities as the main provider of good and sound public education (sustained by realistic and effective policy and programs). Instead, the case portrayed in this paper provides an example of the wide new possibilities posed for public education – given teachers’ agency – once basic requirements are fulfilled by the government and the civil society.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to thank the teachers who participated in the study. Professors Anne H. Dyson, Dorothea Anagnostopoulos and Raven McCrory provided important contributions to this work. Jeff Kupperman is the RiverWalk project coordinator.
REFERENCES Algarte, R. A. 1991, “Escola brasileira e lógica do fracasso: estudo sobre dissimulação e cooptação na política educacional” [Brazilian school and the logics of failure: A study about dissimulation and cooptation in educational policy], PhD Thesis, Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo. Birgin, A. 2000, "Novas regulações do trabalho docente: O caso da reforma Argentina" [Teachers' work new regulations: The case of the Argentine reform]. Cadernos de Pesquisa, vol. 111, no. 13, pp. 95-113. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. 2003. Qualitative research in education. An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). New York, Allyn and Bacon. Bourdieu, P. 1992, The Practice of Reflexive Sociology (The Paris Workshop), in P. Bourdieu, and L. J. D. Wacquant, eds.: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL). Bourdieu, P. 1984, Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P. 1986, The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT, Greenwood. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (Eds.). 1992, The Purpose of Reflexive Sociology (The Chicago Seminar). Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press. Diretrizes. 1997, Diretrizes [Directresses]. Brasília, Brazil, Ministério da Educação e do Desporto/MEC/SEED/PROINFO. Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. 1995, Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. 1998, "What is agency?" The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 962-1023. Erickson, F. D. 1986, Qualitative research in education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Third ed.). Washington, American Research Association. Geertz, C. 1973, The interpretation of cultures. New York, Basic Books. Giddens, A., 1979. Central problems in social theory. New York, Macmillan. Grace, G. 1978, Teachers, ideology and control. Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul. MEC 1997, "Diretrizes" [Directresses], Ministério da Educação e do Desporto/MEC/SEED/PROINFO, Brasília, Brazil. MEC 2002, "Relatório de atividades 1996/2002" [Activities Report 1996/2002], Departamento de Informática na Educação à Distância, DIED-SEED/MEC, Brasília, Brazil. Megahed, N., & Ginsburg, M. 2004, "Stratified students, stratified teachers: Ideologically informed perceptions of educational reform in Egypt". Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7-33. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. 1992, "Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms". Theory into Practice, vol. 31, no. 2. Moraes, M. C. 1997, "Subsídios para fundamentação do programa nacional de informática na educação. Relatório de Atividades 1996/2002". [Subsidies for the establishment of the national program for technology in education. Report of activities 1996/2002], Departamento de Informática na Educação à Distância, DIED-SEED/MEC, Brasília, Brazil. Ortner, S. 1996, Making gender: the politics and erotics of culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Patto, M. H. S. 1999. A produção do fracasso escolar: Histórias de submissão e rebeldia [The production of school failure: Stories of submission and rebellion]. São Paulo, Casa do Psicólogo. Sewell, W. H. 1992, "A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation". American Journal of Sociology, vol. 98, no.1, pp. 1-29. Siqueira, L. F. L. 2000, Representações de professores sobre o desempenho escolar: Um estudo na cidade de Porto Velho - RO [Teachers' representations of school performance: A study about Porto Velho city]. Masters Dissertation. Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo. Wacquant, L. J. D., 1992, Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu's Sociology., in P. Bourdieu, and L. J. D. Wacquant, eds.: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
Endnotes 1 Various programs have been launched by the Federal Government to deploy computers and give training to some public schools in Brazil since the 1990s (MEC, 1997; Moraes, 1997). 2 While these are policies crafted at the federal government level, it is important not to homogenize the Brazilian context given the strong regional differences in the country. Also, a number of educational policies are decided at the state and local levels. 3 For example, in 2001, there were 53,895 computers installed for a universe of 200,000 public schools in Brazil. Only 700 public schools had Internet available (MEC, 2002). That means that only 0.35% of the schools had Internet access. 4 The school year in Brazil runs from late February to December with a one-month vacation in July.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
|